The Dartmouth Atlas is a Road Map to Nowhere

In their continuing quest to convince politicians that health care reform can be financed by greater “efficiency,” Dartmouth Atlas leader Elliott Fisher and a small band of sympathizers cited ten “model regions” in their recent New York Times op-ed (August 13). By their description, they include “towns big and small, urban and rural, North and South, East and West.” Here’s their list: Asheville NC, Cedar Rapids IA, Everett WA, La Crosse WI, Portland ME, Richmond VA, Sacramento CA, Sayre PA, Temple TX and Tallahassee FL. Big? Well Sacramento has more than 400,000 souls, but it’s the largest, and none of the others reaches 200,000. Small? Well, yes. Sayre weighs in at 5,400. The average of all ten is 131,000. Are these representative of America? Hardly. No more than Grand Junction CO (population 50,000), where the President sojourned this weekend to teach us how medicine should be practiced. Even if Medicare was a valid metric, can we design health care reform based on health care spending in these communities? You’re kidding! The major challenges are in the big urban centers, where affluence and poverty intersect, and in the old Confederacy, with its broad swath of poverty and accompanying poor outcomes that put the US at the bottom of the pack internationally.

The Dartmouth Atlas has led policy-makers to believe that future expenditures can be off-set by small town efficiency. Their route to efficiency is through “pay-for-value,” which would reimburse doctors and hospitals more if they spent less but had good outcomes, like in small towns. On the surface, this makes sense. We’ll pay more for cars that run better. But patients aren’t cars, and south Los Angeles is not Grand Junction, and Medicare spending is not even a valid measure of value. The worst outcomes are among patients who are sickest and need the most, and they cost the most, and disproportionate numbers of them are poor. Pay-for-value would cut reimbursement to hospitals that readmit more patients, most of whom are poor, and penalize physicians who provide more services to patients, most of whom are also poor. If America truly wants health care reform, it will need a new map, one that can distinguish the eastern megopolis from open plains and the poverty belt from the rust belt. The Dartmouth Atlas is a map to nowhere.

Advertisements

One comment

  1. Pingback: The Road Back from Dartmouth Deception Will Be Difficult, but We Must Now BeginDartmouth is Dead « PHYSICIANS and HEALTH CARE REFORM Commentaries and Controversies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s