To: The Senate Finance Committee from an Economist and a Doctor (abbreviated)

We wish to comment on the Committee’s statement that studies of geographic variation consistently show that 30% of Medicare spending is wasted, and on the Committee’s conclusion that policies requiring spending reductions by physicians whose spending is above a certain threshold may be useful.

While the studies cited are consistent, so too are their methodological shortcomings. In particular, Medicare spending cannot serve as a proxy for real resources inputs (labor and capital) (see Mississippi, Alabama and Nevada). When total health care spending is assessed, instead, higher resource inputs are generally associated with better quality, even recognizing that the highest resource use is by patients who are sickest and whose outcomes are the poorest.

The notion of “30% waste” has deeper roots in an invalid thread of logic that begins by characterizing regional differences in Medicare spending as “unexplained,” and because differences are “unexplained,” they must be unwarranted, and because they are unwarranted, they must be wasted. Logic dictates that, when differences are unexplained, explanations must be sought. In fact, when that has occurred, variation has been attribltable to differences in the prevalence of disease, patients’ risk factors, patients’ income, community characteristics and even altitude. Moreover, these pervasive and stubborn variations have been found in other developed countries, where health care financing and delivery systems are very different from the US. 

The belief that broad-scale geographic variation in Medicare spending can offer a path to short-run savings is incorrect. It should not form the basis for incentives or penalties affecting physicians’ practices. Indeed, restrictive policies, including those under consideration, could deprive some patients of beneficial care.

Richard A. Cooper, MD, Professor of Medicine                                                                Mark Pauly, PhD, Bendheim Professor of Health Care Management and Economics                                                                                                                               University of Pennsylvania

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Pingback: Five Top Blog Postings « PHYSICIAN SHORTAGES IN THE US Commentaries and Controversies
  2. Don Blain MD FACS

    On the physican shortage, Academia has conveyed the myth that only the gifted may become physicians. Medicine is lengthy to learn but simple to understand. An ordinary person, with the ability for sustained effort, may make an excellent doctor.
    WW2 premed was two years and medical school was three years, year around. Why not now?

  3. Pingback: The Road Back from Dartmouth Deception Will Be Difficult, but We Must Now BeginDartmouth is Dead « PHYSICIANS and HEALTH CARE REFORM Commentaries and Controversies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s