In his interview in Sunday’s Times Magazine, President Obama was quick to point out that “most doctors want to do right by their patients.” But he went on to say, “so if it turns out that doctors in Florida are spending 25 percent more on treating their patients as doctors in Minnesota, and the doctors in Minnesota are getting outcomes that are just as good — then us going down to Florida and pointing out that this is how folks in Minnesota are doing it and they seem to be getting pretty good outcomes, and are there particular reasons why you’re doing what you’re doing? — I think that conversation will ultimately yield some significant savings.” And that’s straight from the Dartmouth playbook, which is never straight. So let’s take a look at what’s really going on.
Yes, President Obama is right. Adjusted for price, Medicare expenditures per enrollee are 25% higher in Florida than Minnesota. And, as measured by various quality standards, Florida ranks lower. But the quality standards used reflect health care throughout the community, not just among Medicare patients – indeed mammography screening rates are lower in Florida in both the Medicare age group and among younger women. Such outcomes depend on inputs from all sources, not just Medicare. So how do Minnesota and Florida stack up? Minnesota spends more per capita, not less - 13% more. It’s not a low-cost haven. Minnesota has lower Medicare expenditures but, with fewer uninsured, good benefits plans and generous Medicaid, it spends more overall – and it gets more!
If the President visits Miami and Minneapolis, he’s likely to find out something else – something that he’s had lots of experience with in Chicago. He’ll find poverty in Miami, especially in the Medicare age group. Almost 30% of Miami’s seniors are below the poverty line, triple the rate in Minneapolis. When the distribution of household income is examined, Miami resembles Chicago’s 17th and 20th Wards - familiar turf for the President - a preponderance of poor households. And we know that folks in the lowest range of household income use twice the health care resources as those in the top, or even middle (see “Lets Talk About Poverty“).
Although the Dartmouth folks grumble that “single working mothers in Nebraska are footing the bill for gold-plated health care provided to high-income Medicare enrollees in Miami,” it’s Miami’s poor who use the most. So, the message is that poverty is expensive to the health care system, including to Medicare , and like Chicago’s south side, south-Florida has lots of it, while Minneapolis has very little. Miami’s poorer outcomes reflect its burden of poverty and Florida’s overall under-investment in health care. Yes, Mr. Obama is right. A straight-talking conversation will ultimately yield significant insight about spending. The title of that conversation may surprise some, but it won’t surprise the President – it’s POVERTY.
7 responses so far ↓
To the Senate Finance Committee from Cooper and Pauly (exerpt) « PHYSICIAN SHORTAGES IN THE US Commentaries and Controversies // May 27, 2009 at 12:36 am |
[...] care must be wasted. Unexplained differences should not lead to unambiguous assumptions but to a search for explanations. In fact, when searches have been made, the observed variation has often been found to result from [...]
Five Top Blog Postings « PHYSICIAN SHORTAGES IN THE US Commentaries and Controversies // May 29, 2009 at 11:16 pm |
[...] Straight Talk for a Straight-Talking President [...]
Gotcha on McAllen « PHYSICIAN SHORTAGES IN THE US Commentaries and Controversies // June 9, 2009 at 8:42 pm |
[...] risk and income levels, but when adjusted for risk and income, the differences were very small); and (9) why spending in Miami is not like Minneapolis (because it’s as poor as the wards in Chicago where [...]
About McAllen « PHYSICIAN SHORTAGES IN THE US Commentaries and Controversies // June 17, 2009 at 11:08 am |
[...] Indeed, what the suppliers desire most is fewer demands on their already overworked lives. As in Chicago, poverty [...]
Meeting Poverty on “Meet the Press” « PHYSICIANS and HEALTH CARE REFORM Commentaries and Controversies // January 3, 2010 at 11:29 pm |
[...] group’s disciples is to compare some high cost locale with a low cost locale. First it was Miami vs. Mayo, then Birmingham vs. Grand Junction, then Los Angeles vs. Green Bay and now it’s Los Angeles vs. [...]
Lower Poverty Rates Result In Lower Healthcare Costs - Better Health // January 11, 2010 at 4:01 pm |
[...] of Dartmouth disciples is to compare some high cost locale with a low cost locale. First it was Miami vs. Mayo, then Birmingham vs. Grand Junction, then Los Angeles vs. Green Bay and now it’s Los Angeles vs. [...]
Lower Poverty Rates Result In Lower Healthcare Costs « health care commentaries from around the world // January 11, 2010 at 5:18 pm |
[...] of Dartmouth disciples is to compare some high cost locale with a low cost locale. First it was Miami vs. Mayo, then Birmingham vs. Grand Junction, then Los Angeles vs. Green Bay and now it’s Los Angeles vs. [...]